There's no "sounds more likely" about it. It's just plain wrong to put yourself first.
And I note that you quote 'the Queen's English as she are spoke' as well. And I would have thought that HM had every right to put herself first, but doesn't.
That's the very point that I was making above. Sitting around (whether in a cold tent or a warm waiting room) is not universal as Karen from TwitFace implied.
Well informed possibly, but wrong. I had the 15 min wait thing, but it was in a nice warm waiting room.
But those 'very special circumstances' are always present in all the numeric ones KS that I have come across. In fact you can usually fill in 4 to 7 squares immediately by using it without too much thought.
Same rule of 45 rules.
OK have it your way (wrong)!
OK, the symbols could be changed to make it harder.
But your example above is EXACTLY how it helps. Perhaps ignoring that is why you have difficulty. :duel:
Try it on a real one as I can't be assed to elaborate without an example.
Unless you have twigged that the sum of the numbers (counting?) in every row and column and all 9 sub squares is 45 then that's where you are going wrong.
Totally irrelevant. I was replying to MartinOnline who quoted two conflicting answers from you, which you still haven't corrected
And I counter suggest that if you post something that is wrong, thaen admit/correct it when it has been pointed out. I don't need to have the box to see conflicting...
There's no "sounds more likely" about it. It's just plain wrong to put yourself first.
And I note that you quote 'the Queen's English as she are spoke' as well. And I would have thought that HM had every right to put herself first, but doesn't.
That's the very point that I was making above. Sitting around (whether in a cold tent or a warm waiting room) is not universal as Karen from TwitFace implied.
Well informed possibly, but wrong. I had the 15 min wait thing, but it was in a nice warm waiting room.
But those 'very special circumstances' are always present in all the numeric ones KS that I have come across. In fact you can usually fill in 4 to 7 squares immediately by using it without too much thought.
Same rule of 45 rules.
OK have it your way (wrong)!
OK, the symbols could be changed to make it harder.
But your example above is EXACTLY how it helps. Perhaps ignoring that is why you have difficulty. :duel:
Try it on a real one as I can't be assed to elaborate without an example.
Unless you have twigged that the sum of the numbers (counting?) in every row and column and all 9 sub squares is 45 then that's where you are going wrong.
Totally irrelevant. I was replying to MartinOnline who quoted two conflicting answers from you, which you still haven't corrected
And I counter suggest that if you post something that is wrong, thaen admit/correct it when it has been pointed out. I don't need to have the box to see conflicting...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.