boot-settings
package or at least reference it from the quoted post?While not wishing to be picky, this is pushing it. You can't make a statistically significant observation of a reduction in frequency from an already very low frequency, without an extremely long period of data gathering to compare rates of incidence between users who perform a regular system flush with a control population of those who don't.reformatting the flash configuration areas using the system flush update seems to reduce the frequency of these.
There are at least three reported instances of boxes which were experiencing very frequent resets (weekly or monthly) before flushing, and not afterwards. The Humax code drops into the setup routine based on values it reads from the configuration database; it is not much of a stretch to assume that corruption is involved.While not wishing to be picky, this is pushing it. You can't make a statistically significant observation of a reduction in frequency from an already very low frequency, without an extremely long period of data gathering to compare rates of incidence between users who perform a regular system flush with a control population of those who don't.
I haven't had the Wizard appear when this setting was in place. Have other people had experience with it?The problem (to my mind) is that this is not proven.
boot-settings
, there's no way that the Wizard can improve their experience. Either the system comes back up with tuned channels etc despite what the Humax startup code thought, or it doesn't, in which case the CF user can choose how to fix the problem (restore backup, system flush, etc).boot-settings
-- if only so that the CF user can give the box a smug look.