So long as you are aware of encryption issues and take appropriate measures (eg decrypt everything first, and/or set the encryption keys to be the same for both units), of course it is possible.
The way I would do it (bearing in mind I haven't) is to make one unit an extension of the other's...
My thoughts are this is just a coincidence. Timeout responding to HTTP requests is not that unusual, although I'm surprised ping didn't work. That implies something not working between the "laptop" and the HDR-FOX.
Whatever it was sorted itself out (perhaps poked by the previous access...
Menu >> Settings >> System >> System Information >> System ID = 80BC.7E00 for HDR-FOX and 806C.7000 for HD-FOX. However, I didn't spot it as my "office" unit is a HD-FOX and the HD-FOX crash dump doesn't include the System ID string.
It is odd that the 2000T seems to have the same System ID as...
I call it the most interesting thing in Hummyland for ages. The OP found something new, 15 years into HDR-FOX ownership. I admit this may be purely academic, with no practical benefit, but how much else started like that?
Is it generated within the SoC itself, or using firmware Humax were...
It's your funeral, not ours. Do it whatever way you like. We can only advise (and any advice given is purely voluntary – there is no beef).
Perhaps it does make some sense, if you mean the NAS script Telnets into the Foxsat to send the command for the Foxsat to run. But it doesn't really...
Oh FFS.
I downloaded Google's rip of an 1895 print lodged in the Bodleian in 1896.
So all the way through I've been befuddled by the reader having an affectation! Stand down.
Those have got to be memory locations, haven't they? In which case the X might be the hex prefix.
Testing services up to LCN100 which show the "i" icon on the i-plate:
LCNServiceMuxResponds to TEXT?Crash on Multiple TEXT?
1BBC ONEBBC A, DVB-TYesNo
2BBC TWOBBC A, DVB-T
YesNo
7Bristol...
Here's the complete screen dump from my HD-FOX. Note the difference in the "WAI:" line. I presume the screenshots above were from HDR-FOX, and include a "HMX7E0000" string. "HMX" = Humax? Or is is HM x7E0000??
blacklistCheck
blacklistCheckFilebl Loaded
blacklistCheckbl2
Blacklist completed...
I'm doing this on HD-FOX, by the way.
This is not a "pop up", it is a text console overlay.
The only way to clear it seems to be to change channel.
It seems to be the result of overloading the command input with text commands.
It still happens with the network disconnected.
I have confirmed...
Perhaps because something is getting handed off to the TV over the HDMI data side-channel. However, as you seem to be able to reproduce this, how exactly are you doing it?
Update: OK, I've done it (LCN41)!
I take that back, sorry. Never seen anything like it before. Perhaps if we can work...
What the hell is wrong with polling? Your Foxsat is a computer, and what else are computers good at other than automating dull, repetitive jobs? Is there some reason it can't spare a few clock cycles every few minutes? Is your network going to break if there are too many no-response pings...
You've posted in the HDR-FOX section of the forum. If you intended this to be information non-specific to HDR-FOX, you should be posting in the relevant section or Hummy Arms. The context is gleaned from the forum subject area, so it's your own doing.
I can't reproduce what you've said, and I'm having trouble believing what you have photographed is output from the HDR-FOX.
I believe your TV is displaying that itself, and not originated from the HDR-FOX.
I could have said "it were always raining in Wales", but that seems like stating the obvious. I was in Leicester contemporary with Ripping Yarns, or there abouts, which is why it got riffed as a personal meme.
No, "my acquaintance" (when clearly referring to more than one). Possibly there is a silent apostrophe in the spelling, which could make it work, if in that era they didn't like the sound of "acquaintances" (like James' ball).
Thanks for that. I expected our Hummies would be too smart/dumb to respond in the required manner.
I suppose the specific target devices are programmed with a "_S_O_S_T_R_E_A_MAX" executable for some reason, which does something convenient for hackers (and perhaps Chinese overlords).
So long as you are aware of encryption issues and take appropriate measures (eg decrypt everything first, and/or set the encryption keys to be the same for both units), of course it is possible.
The way I would do it (bearing in mind I haven't) is to make one unit an extension of the other's...
My thoughts are this is just a coincidence. Timeout responding to HTTP requests is not that unusual, although I'm surprised ping didn't work. That implies something not working between the "laptop" and the HDR-FOX.
Whatever it was sorted itself out (perhaps poked by the previous access...
Menu >> Settings >> System >> System Information >> System ID = 80BC.7E00 for HDR-FOX and 806C.7000 for HD-FOX. However, I didn't spot it as my "office" unit is a HD-FOX and the HD-FOX crash dump doesn't include the System ID string.
It is odd that the 2000T seems to have the same System ID as...
I call it the most interesting thing in Hummyland for ages. The OP found something new, 15 years into HDR-FOX ownership. I admit this may be purely academic, with no practical benefit, but how much else started like that?
Is it generated within the SoC itself, or using firmware Humax were...
It's your funeral, not ours. Do it whatever way you like. We can only advise (and any advice given is purely voluntary – there is no beef).
Perhaps it does make some sense, if you mean the NAS script Telnets into the Foxsat to send the command for the Foxsat to run. But it doesn't really...
Oh FFS.
I downloaded Google's rip of an 1895 print lodged in the Bodleian in 1896.
So all the way through I've been befuddled by the reader having an affectation! Stand down.
Those have got to be memory locations, haven't they? In which case the X might be the hex prefix.
Testing services up to LCN100 which show the "i" icon on the i-plate:
LCNServiceMuxResponds to TEXT?Crash on Multiple TEXT?
1BBC ONEBBC A, DVB-TYesNo
2BBC TWOBBC A, DVB-T
YesNo
7Bristol...
Here's the complete screen dump from my HD-FOX. Note the difference in the "WAI:" line. I presume the screenshots above were from HDR-FOX, and include a "HMX7E0000" string. "HMX" = Humax? Or is is HM x7E0000??
blacklistCheck
blacklistCheckFilebl Loaded
blacklistCheckbl2
Blacklist completed...
I'm doing this on HD-FOX, by the way.
This is not a "pop up", it is a text console overlay.
The only way to clear it seems to be to change channel.
It seems to be the result of overloading the command input with text commands.
It still happens with the network disconnected.
I have confirmed...
Perhaps because something is getting handed off to the TV over the HDMI data side-channel. However, as you seem to be able to reproduce this, how exactly are you doing it?
Update: OK, I've done it (LCN41)!
I take that back, sorry. Never seen anything like it before. Perhaps if we can work...
What the hell is wrong with polling? Your Foxsat is a computer, and what else are computers good at other than automating dull, repetitive jobs? Is there some reason it can't spare a few clock cycles every few minutes? Is your network going to break if there are too many no-response pings...
You've posted in the HDR-FOX section of the forum. If you intended this to be information non-specific to HDR-FOX, you should be posting in the relevant section or Hummy Arms. The context is gleaned from the forum subject area, so it's your own doing.
I can't reproduce what you've said, and I'm having trouble believing what you have photographed is output from the HDR-FOX.
I believe your TV is displaying that itself, and not originated from the HDR-FOX.
I could have said "it were always raining in Wales", but that seems like stating the obvious. I was in Leicester contemporary with Ripping Yarns, or there abouts, which is why it got riffed as a personal meme.
No, "my acquaintance" (when clearly referring to more than one). Possibly there is a silent apostrophe in the spelling, which could make it work, if in that era they didn't like the sound of "acquaintances" (like James' ball).
Thanks for that. I expected our Hummies would be too smart/dumb to respond in the required manner.
I suppose the specific target devices are programmed with a "_S_O_S_T_R_E_A_MAX" executable for some reason, which does something convenient for hackers (and perhaps Chinese overlords).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.