• The forum software that supports hummy.tv has been upgraded to XenForo 2.3!

    Please bear with us as we continue to tweak things, and feel free to post any questions, issues or suggestions in the upgrade thread.

Announcing DNS name on uPnP (for webif)

wilf

New Member
Hi all,

I couldn't find this covered anywhere, so I thought I'd post on here.

The HDR fox announces it's NetBios name for file shares etc. and is visible in DLNA (such uses uPnP )
What would be great is the box would register a domain name on uPnP (router permitting) .

E.g.
Http:// humax.interface

The idea being to give a more user friendly, static (on dhcp, the up address can change) access point for the webif.

I'm not that familiar with what uPnP can do, but does this sound a plausible feature? And might a package be plausible to add it to the custom firmware?

Wilf


p.s.
The 3view box seems to announce DNS name, which my router presents as [name].config, though that wasn't the case for all user's routers.
 
Does your DHCP server send a domain name to clients ?
Having asked that, I ought to check whether the Humax dhcp client asks for the domain name option.

Anyway, upshot is this should be set via DHCP, not uPnP.
 
Thanks.

I'm only familiar with DHCP for assigning IP addresses.

Will a DHCP hostname work in a web browser?
I.e as far as I'm aware a browser uses DNS, so I guess I'm asking; will a successful DHCP hostage registration register a DNS enter on my router?

If so, anyone know whether the Humax is supposed to be doing this?

P.s. my router does have a self generated DNS entry for the humax consisting of :
"unknown.[Mac address].config"

Which means I have a static DNS entry which does what I'm after for now.
 
The 3view box must be using some zeroconf service (either mDNS or SSDP). Something like that could be added to the Humax fairly easily.
 
Give the new zeroconf package a try.. it should create a humax.local name which can be seen by anything running mDNS - works fine from my Macbook anyway.
 
Thanks.

I'm only familiar with DHCP for assigning IP addresses.

I've just wiresharked the Humax's ethernet port on startup, its DHCP request is asking for:
IP address; Subnet Mask; Broadcast Address; Time Offset; Router; Domain Name; Domain Name Server; Domain Search; Host Name; NetBIOS server name; NetBIOS server scope; MTU; Static Routes; NTP Server; Private/Proxy autodiscovery

That list is pretty typical of a request. The DHCP server in the average ADSL router will respond with IP address; Subnet Mask; Broadcast Address; Router; Domain Name Server and nothing else. You might be able to add options to the router's DHCP server (e.g. DGTeam firmware for Netgears), or you can run a DHCP server (ISC DHCP is good) on another machine on the LAN.
 
Hi both,

Thanks af123, that sound spot on. I've installed, but I'm guessing a reboot will be needed as my Android browser isn't picking up the advice on humax.local yet. I'll reboot when there's no recording in the way.

I'll have a look at my router options at some point Andrew, it's a reasonably wide-spread, rebadged Thompson from be.

Thanks for the help.
 
I hadn't checked until you asked but CPU was running at 41% (system) with it installed but 37% without.

HTH.
 
Normally I average around 4% system (assuming there's no decrypt going on).

I noticed today there had been approx 40% constantly since turning on. Tried a reboot and updated to 1.4 with no change.
Looking at a 1 day graph it was clear that this began immediately after installing zeroconf last night.
Remove package/reboot = back to 4%. (Repeated to check - reinstall = 40%, remove = 4%).
 
It looks like it might be in a select loop with a timeout of zero which causes it to return immediately.

Code:
[pid  3037] _newselect(6, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {0, 0} <unfinished ...>
[pid  3036] <... rt_sigprocmask resumed> NULL, 16) = 0
[pid  3037] <... _newselect resumed> )  = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
[pid  3036] nanosleep({3600, 0},  <unfinished ...>
[pid  3037] sendto(5, "\0\0\204\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\5\5_http\4_tcp\5local\0\0\f"...
, 192, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(5353), sin_addr=inet_addr("224.0.0
.251")}, 16) = 192
[pid  3037] _newselect(6, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 2 (in [3 5], left {0, 0}
)
[pid  3037] recvfrom(5, "\0\0\204\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\5\5_http\4_tcp\5local\0\0\f".
.., 65536, 0, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(5353), sin_addr=inet_addr("192
.168.1.251")}, [16]) = 192
[pid  3037] _newselect(6, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
[pid  3037] _newselect(6, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
[pid  3037] _newselect(6, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
[pid  3037] _newselect(6, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {0, 0})
  :
  :
  :
 
You can keep track on each process by running top from a Telnet window, as you can see in this picture humaxtv is taking about 9%, top itself about 1% and everything else not much at all. CTRL-C to exit top.
BTW
I am not running zeroconf

top.jpg
 
I've uploaded a new version of the zeroconf package which fixes the high CPU utilisation (now uses practically none as intended) and adds initial LLMNR support (see below)

This package introduces a small daemon which implements both the Apple mDNS and Microsoft LLMNR protocols for zeroconf name resolution (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_configuration_networking#Name_resolution)

The first implementation is working properly in that I can successfully resolve the Humax from Linux and Apple hosts, e.g.:

Code:
root@raspberrypi:/home/pi# apt-get install libnss-mdns
...
root@raspberrypi:/home/pi# ping humax.local
PING humax.local (172.29.0.252) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from humax.local (172.29.0.252): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=8.93 ms

and

Code:
air(7) uname -a
Darwin air 11.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.0: Mon Apr  9 19:32:15 PDT 2012; root:xnu-1699.26.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
air(8) ping humax.local
PING humax.local (172.29.0.252): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.29.0.252: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=7.616 ms

The LLMNR implementation doesn't seem to be working properly yet, although packet traces show that the right thing is occurring (next step is to read the RFC properly!).

Code:
No.    Time          Source                Destination          Protocol Length Info
    19 2.194065000    172.29.0.67          224.0.0.252          LLMNR    65    Standard query 0xedf8 A humax
 
Frame 19: 65 bytes on wire (520 bits), 65 bytes captured (520 bits)
Ethernet II, Src: Apple_24:99:42 (28:37:37:xx:xx:xx), Dst: IPv4mcast_00:00:fc (01:00:5e:00:00:fc)
Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 172.29.0.67 (172.29.0.67), Dst: 224.0.0.252 (224.0.0.252)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 61275 (61275), Dst Port: llmnr (5355)
Link-local Multicast Name Resolution (query)
    Transaction ID: 0xedf8
    Flags: 0x0000 (Standard query)
    Questions: 1
    Answer RRs: 0
    Authority RRs: 0
    Additional RRs: 0
    Queries
        humax: type A, class IN
            Name: humax
            Type: A (Host address)
            Class: IN (0x0001)
 
No.    Time          Source                Destination          Protocol Length Info
    20 2.200731000    172.29.0.252          172.29.0.67          LLMNR    75    Standard query response 0xedf8 A 172.29.0.252
 
Frame 20: 75 bytes on wire (600 bits), 75 bytes captured (600 bits)
Ethernet II, Src: Humax_bb:93:c3 (00:03:78:xx:xx:xx), Dst: Apple_24:99:42 (28:37:37:xx:xx:xx)
Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 172.29.0.252 (172.29.0.252), Dst: 172.29.0.67 (172.29.0.67)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: llmnr (5355), Dst Port: 61275 (61275)
Link-local Multicast Name Resolution (response)
    Transaction ID: 0xedf8
    Flags: 0x8400 (Standard query response, No error)
    Questions: 0
    Answer RRs: 1
    Authority RRs: 0
    Additional RRs: 0
    Answers
        humax: type A, class IN, addr 172.29.0.252
            Name: humax
            Type: A (Host address)
            Class: IN (0x0001)
            Time to live: 2 minutes
            Data length: 4
            Addr: 172.29.0.252 (172.29.0.252)
 
If I install this then, I can just browse or Telnet or FTP "Humax.local"? What happens with two Humii on the network?
 
If I install this then, I can just browse or Telnet or FTP "Humax.local"? What happens with two Humii on the network?

You can if the client you're using supports MDNS. Windows computers which have iTunes installed and library sharing enabled support MDNS, as do Linux boxes with the right NSS plugin and Apple devices by default.

The package advertises whatever hostname you've set for the Humax followed by the .local, so humax.local by default but you may well have set the second to humaxbedroom.local
 
zeroconf was working fine yesterday (iPad/Safari), today I have to go back to the IP addresses. Any clues why?
 
The modified source package hasn't made it to the source repository. This makes it tricky to identify why mdnsd might report Couldn't retrieve humax IP address.

Also, as this is the designated package thread, here are some other issues.
 
Back
Top