It's nothing like that often for me. I can't remember the last time I had to log back in.I don't think I have to re-log-in as often as 30 days.
That does not really answer my question, how are they able to get beyond the log in page to a specific page even it they get an error message there without logging in ?They are seeing an error message, as indicated by an exclamation mark in a triangle, see screenshot below.
View attachment 7666
That is already ticked and remains ticked but only functions whilst my browser is open and I have to log in again every time after closing my browser even if it is just for a minute. I guess I will just have to put up with it as I have no wish to change my browsers cache and memory clean up settings just for here.There is a box to tick on the log in page which keeps you signed in for 30 days, which is what I use.
Not a hardship just an inconvenience when you only need to read and after doing so you have no need to post anything so had no need to log in. Maybe the issue affected others more than me but no matter how many guests were here I did not notice any real difference in loading times before so for me it is using a sledge hammer to crack a nut and if the only thing they see is an error message would the numbers have declined in time anyway?.Is it such a hardship to log in to view, and participate on the forum?
Any chance of a reply as to why they are showing as viewing various pages, profiles and forum lists when we just get the log in page please?The forum hasn't slowed down for me yet since making changes, whereas previously it was taking around 30 seconds to load any page, and performing any moderation tasks when there were thousands of "Guests" online.
Will keep an eye on things to see how many guests are online this evening.
I can't answer that, as I don't know.Any chance of a reply as to why they are showing as viewing various pages, profiles and forum lists when we just get the log in page please?
Thanks anyway, maybe someone has a theory to offer and it turns out to be benign.I can't answer that, as I don't know.
This thread shows that we are not alone with this issue.Thanks anyway, maybe someone has a theory to offer and it turns out to be benign.
The software appears to be able to differentiate between members, guests and robotsI don’t think that the forum software can differentiate between them, so we either have none, or both.
The software differentiates between user groups, and in our case members not logged in are treated as guests, the same as robots, and come under the unregistered/unconfirmed user group.The software appears to be able to differentiate between members, guests and robots
Robots appear to be the search engines so it is the non-human guests we wish to discourage. Many sites seem to use those annoying "Verify you are human" images.
I don't like them but maybe they could be used as alternative to forcing logon for those that don't like being premanently logged on - just as long as logged users aren't subjected to them.
How can it tell? The presence of a cookie?? If a banned user finds and deletes that cookie, they become no longer banned but a normal non-registered guest.members not logged in are treated as guests
That may be the case, I don’t know, but they won’t be able to login, or see anything on the forum.How can it tell? The presence of a cookie?? If a banned user finds and deletes that cookie, they become no longer banned but a normal non-registered guest.
I am fine with the "Verify you are human" idea but only if it is not the click on all the cars/ zebra crossings/ motor bike etc pics type used by many sites. The pics are often so blurry, distant or not obvious that it is easy to get wrong. Other sites use a simple slider to align a picture or click on the object which is moving differently and they never cause any frustration.The software appears to be able to differentiate between members, guests and robots
Robots appear to be the search engines so it is the non-human guests we wish to discourage. Many sites seem to use those annoying "Verify you are human" images.
I don't like them but maybe they could be used as alternative to forcing logon for those that don't like being premanently logged on - just as long as logged users aren't subjected to them.