Government Finally Reveals When It Wants Freeview Gone

@Owen Smith, me too (obvs, not the weird 4k stuff).

I was also happy with these snippets (anyone who went through the online survey, which worked in SeaMomkey 2.53.24, kudos to Qualtrics, can guess what question was being answered):

Instead of abandoning the existing efficient high-bandwidth broadcasting system, with its built-in privacy among other desirable features, the life of the system should be guaranteed for the indefinite future. Broadcasters could then be confident in the system and should be encouraged to treat it as a first-class distribution system rather than as at present hoping not to be the last user to turn out the lights.

If there is an economic failure, it is that each of many players is incentivised to create too much look-alike content that many potential viewers cannot find, or cannot access, or don't have time to watch.

It turns out that we are prepared to institute our own regulations on matters like age verification, content and user curfews for internet platforms regardless of domicile. Whether or not you agree with these steps towards a North Korean internet, the door is already open, if not to seizing content from Amazon Prime or Netflix, then certainly to encouraging or forcing such companies to participate in the UK broadcasting system.

And as to the question about environmental impact of a hypothetical "switch-off", s/t like

Surely this is exactly what civil servants are paid to work out? Or forward your ITT for consultancy services.
 
Last edited:
Not always convinced by Cordbusters, but this popped up on a social media feed.
Feed that failure into the Green Paper discussions!
Still more questions than answers but at least the EZ got a mention and Humax might even sell a couple of boxes if they can play on it also having Freeview as a backup when Freely fails though if it now needs a factory reset and it wipes any recordings we should see a few more appearing on Amazon and Ebay.
 
Unfortunately losing Freeview will probably kill FM (and DAB but I don't care) radio, because radio won't be able to support the costs of running the masts. TV covers most of the fixed maintenance costs.
 
156,000.000 reasons why the fight to keep Freeview looks like a lost cause.

To quote that article:

BBC income is around a quarter lower in real terms than at the start of the current Charter, a drop of about £1.2 billion.

The above is easily fixable by restoring the BBC licence fee to it's previous value in real terms ie accounting for inflation.
 
The above is easily fixable by restoring the BBC licence fee to it's previous value in real terms ie accounting for inflation.
And/or close the loophole that allows people to opt out.

People argue against the idea of having a licence fee at all, but the alternative is American TV.
 
What a mess…
My 85 year old aunt is one of the people with no broadband. She has an analogue landline and a Humax HDR Fox T2. She is totally incapable of operating technology, it took her years to get used to operating the HDR Fox T2. When she phones her GP to make an appointment she is told to do it online, and they ask for her mobile number so they can text her. She then turns up in person to make an appointment, and basically has to fake a near mental breakdown to get an appointment booked in person.
 
Judging by what happened in Midlothian, the analogue line may not be available for much longer. I managed to get FTTC and VoIP and my latter supplier sold me a device to use my analog (well, DECT) phone-device. It was not obvious to achieve even with a very willing broadband supplier, so she may need help to get to that point, but the set-up is similar to analog phone.
 
Back
Top