Black Hole
May contain traces of nut
Is there a difference between "CVBS" and "Composite"? If they are the same thing by a different name, that would explain my confusion.
Yes I'm expecting quality to be pretty poor. I'm only on ADSL2 at the moment (fibre isn't available from Openreach where I am), but plan on moving to Virgin Broadband when my current deal expires in January. Until then my upload speed is only around 512kbps!Pretty sure using a slingbox (HD or not) quality is going to be down to your ISP upload speed. Using a Broadband speed checker like http://www.broadbandspeedchecker.co.uk/ what is your upload speed.
Unless you have a exceptional upload speed this is likely to be the limiting factor. For most of us download is much faster than upload. Mine is 70Mbps which is fast enough given one user to cope with a full quality Blu-ray stream if one existed.
Upload speed is 2.42 Mbps way less than even the crap quality SD channels let alone the 720 x 576 BBC channels. It;s not going to look great, nowhere near as good as downloading content to watch on line from say BBCI player or streamed abroad using a VPN service,
You should look at using a local Freesat or Freeview recording box with IP streaming connected to your network. SD quality streaming of recordings or live over the internet is pretty good on a mobile device.
https://www.vboxcomm.com/uk-freeview-and-freesat.html
Is there a difference between "CVBS" and "Composite"? If they are the same thing by a different name, that would explain my confusion.
At 512kbps don't expect the Slingbox to be of any use at all!
The VBox eliminates umpteen stages of conversion - you want to receive a DVB-T/T2 UHF signal with the Humax, demultiplex and decode it into digital streams (optionally storing it), convert it to analogue to send to the Slingbox, convert it back to digital streams in the Slingbox (it's probably easier to re-sample it to a lower bit rate that way), and then transmit it over the LAN/WAN to a display device (which converts the digital streams to actual sound and pictures).
With the VBox: it just receives the DVB, demultiplexes and decodes it, and then makes the streams directly available on the LAN.
If you want an impedance mis-matched bodge, yes.
It's difficult to see what they do apart from connect the wires together.Simple and cheap adaptors are widely available.
OK so the main advantage over the Humax/Slingbox solution is output quality? Since this solution will be mainly for when I am travelling that's probably less relevant to me, as I'll be at the mercy of whatever bandwidth I have wherever I happen to be. Even when the upgrade to Virgin Media arrives it'll be the internet connection at the remote location that will probably be the weak link.At 512kbps don't expect the Slingbox to be of any use at all!
The VBox eliminates umpteen stages of conversion - you want to receive a DVB-T/T2 UHF signal with the Humax, demultiplex and decode it into digital streams (optionally storing it), convert it to analogue to send to the Slingbox, convert it back to digital streams in the Slingbox (it's probably easier to re-sample it to a lower bit rate that way), and then transmit it over the LAN/WAN to a display device (which converts the digital streams to actual sound and pictures).
With the VBox: it just receives the DVB, demultiplexes and decodes it, and then makes the streams directly available on the LAN.
OK so the main advantage over the Humax/Slingbox solution is output quality? Since this solution will be mainly for when I am travelling that's probably less relevant to me, as I'll be at the mercy of whatever bandwidth I have wherever I happen to be. Even when the upgrade to Virgin Media arrives it'll be the internet connection at the remote location that will probably be the weak link.
The VBox seems to be an IP-based alternative to the Humax, but perhaps less feature-rich than a Humax with custom firmware. Would there be any point in having both a Humax and a VBox?