Thread about possible site buyout removed

[prpr]

Presumably the mods. can do it, or the original posters can repeat their actions.

 

[Black Hole]

I doubt the mods can do it.

 

[Trev]

I can't understand why you find this important?

 

[Black Hole]

What concerns me is that you-know-who, apparently unilaterally (was there any discussion behind the scenes we are not aware of?), decided to just do what the party in question requested, regardless of the opinion of the other forum members - particularly me (I offered a workable solution, which was disregarded). The action appears, on the face of it, even to have cut across the forum OWNERs opinion. WHY?

 

[RobH1]

I can't understand why you find this important?

It isn't that I find it "important", but just asking a simple question. 'Likes' are agreements in principle with that member's comment and for anyone to remove them without consent is fundamentally wrong.
Despite my frivolous post, I won't lose sleep over it!

 

[Trev]

But if the 'likes' were in response to a thread that has been deleted, then surely they are irrelevant anyway.

 

[RobH1]

The 'likes' were there before the thread was deleted.

 

[Wallace]

I'm not bothered if my 'likes' are returned or not. More important things to worry about.

 

[RobH1]

Ok, I'll donate mine to charity.

 

[MontysEvilTwin]

Ok, I'll donate mine to charity.

Make sure you Gift-Aid your donation so you can claim the tax back