Yes - definitely should be a Conflicts: line in the control file for that one : )I can't think you would want flatten and tidy-folders installed together. They seem mutually exclusive to my mind.
Yes - definitely should be a Conflicts: line in the control file for that one : )I can't think you would want flatten and tidy-folders installed together. They seem mutually exclusive to my mind.
I think to make this package suitable for inclusion in the main package repository it must at least only remove folders that contain only . files.
It would actually be easier in Jim because the box has libraries that automatically determine the media root (different on the HD model).
The key point is that when it thinks a folder is eligible it removes the . files and then removes the folder. If in the meantime something has appeared in there then the subsequent rmdir call will fail (non empty directory error).
Can't find any documentation for it.Yes - definitely should be a Conflicts: line in the control file for that one : )
I can't think you would want flatten and tidy-folders installed together. They seem mutually exclusive to my mind.
It may not surprise you to find I have another extension called "auto-flags" which adds .autodecrypt and .autoshrink to any folders the machine creates automatically as a result of Series Link recordings!
Oh, I see. So somebody with a dedicated folder they use to drop stuff into for shrinking will just have to remake it every time or not use tidy-folders. What's so wrong with using the recycle bin anyway? I'm not talking about what you might do or what I might do, but what would make it most useful to the wider community.