Assume v. Presume

Black Hole said:
Excellent. To which my response is: what the **** is a gerund?
Click to expand...
It's a noun made from a verb by adding "-ing" , as in read/reading or practise/practising.
Black Hole said:
I couldn't spell until I was well into my 20's and started taking more interest. Spelling is easy to look up.
Click to expand...
I have a knack of spotting spelling errors in things I'm not reading so it's clearly a pattern thing and can even work upside down. I've not seen it given as an Asperger's/ASD thing but it's possible. Of course it doesn't work on something I've written until it's too late to correct it.

The longer this goes on the more danger of me falling foul of Muphry's Law...
 
Last edited:
EEPhil said:
I'd endorse that. But I find it even more confusing. I was a product of that experiment the "initial teaching alphabet". So that's mucked up my spelling a bit, but not to Mike2's standard. :D
Click to expand...
Fortunately I missed that, being born in '55, and I remember thinking ITA was a stupid idea at the time.
 
I had to look it up too - it's a self-referential thing; I like those, neat.

Like "there are too errors in this sentence".
 
I loved grammar/syntax at school. (A grammar school in the 60s.)

New programming languages always used to be accompanied by a syntax diagram or diagrams in the past. That was the way compilers or interpreters tokenized the input ready for interpretation. BNF? Anyone remember that?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus–Naur_form

So elegant and unambiguous.

The trouble is, with English, it is just a hotch potch of random rules, no logic to them. My brain rebels at that. Even the syntax for its tokens, words, is a stream of random rules, defying logic.

As for noun, verb, adjective, connective, participle, gerund, etc, what a mess of fuzzy logic!

Stop! An action word. Verb.

Stop. A thing. Noun.

Quiet. A noun, a verb, an adjective.

As for the nonsense of direct and indirect objects, try two place predicates? How about n place predicates for

Bill hit Ben on the head with a mallet in Cardiff.

hit(person1, person2, where, weapon, location)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EEPhil said:
I remember seeing it mentioned in various books but I never made sense of it - mainly because I never needed to use it.
Click to expand...
But if you programmed, and it wasn't just Fortran with GOTO, it was essential to learning

Is this a correctly formed identifier?
Is this a correctly formed program?
Is this a for loop?
Is this statement well formed?

It analyses every concept in a language and gives an exact description of what is and is not allowed.

It was sometimes given as flow diagrams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top