MikeSh
Well-Known Member
A meteor seems the most likely to me.So, what's the streak?
A meteor seems the most likely to me.So, what's the streak?
Maybe, I thought of that but it would have to have been very bright to register. Short streak meteors like that don't tend to be bright. My camera isn't suited to that sort of thing.A meteor seems the most likely to me.
If it was an 8 second exposure it must have been fast moving. As it fades from dim to bright and back it wasn't a fixed light travelling (that I can think of).Maybe, I thought of that but it would have to have been very bright to register. Short streak meteors like that don't tend to be bright. My camera isn't suited to that sort of thing.
Don't you know about Iridium flares? They're not so common as they were a couple of years ago, but occur when a satellite's solar panels catch the sun and reflect it in a particular direction. If you are bang on the beam it can be very bright (and very short lived), but off-beam the intensity could be anything. I guess it doesn't exclude other satellites, but Iridium were the main culprits.As it fades from dim to bright and back it wasn't a fixed light travelling (that I can think of).
No I didn't. Interesting.Don't you know about Iridium flares?
Definitely. I take it you've not seen any of the low-orbit ones such as StarLink, or even the ISS. In fact, that flare may well have been a lot shorter than 8s.Are there satellites that will move as far as in your picture in 8 seconds?
Yes, but a meteor is going fast enough to cover that distance quicker. I didn't know if satellite speeds were comparable.In fact, that flare may well have been a lot shorter than 8s.
Absolutely, it's just that bh has not caught up with decommissioning and that they're just as good as gone .Decomissioning means that Iridium flares are not as predictable as they used to be; I don't think that Heavens Above has a prediction page any more.
URL]
That is interesting, I knew nothing of it. How do you conclude those "hieroglyphs" (for want of a better word) are available in Unicode?There was a proposal for Unicode characters to represent IEC power symbols. Apparently it only took 5 years to get symbols accepted (last year) that are used on billions of manufactured items, by which time historical linguists had been able to represent symbols used on a single 3000-year old artefact with Unicode symbols for more than 10 years, which perhaps says something about the make-up of the Unicode committees.