I wish it was - if it was anything like that I'd have fixed it years ago.Is your aerial or cable loose, or is it the trees waving about?
I wish it was - if it was anything like that I'd have fixed it years ago.Is your aerial or cable loose, or is it the trees waving about?
Aerial is firmly in place and there aren't may trees about. It does seem odd that there is never breakup when it's live TV, so I can't see why signal quality would be only affecting recorded programs.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2133 root 20 -5 7808 7104 1168 R 92 5.7 0:28.36 vmstat
humax# /mod/sbin/filefrag /media/My\ Video/Never\ Mind\ the\ Buzzcocks/Never\ Mind\ the\ Buzzcocks_20121022_2201.ts
/media/My Video/Never Mind the Buzzcocks/Never Mind the Buzzcocks_20121022_2201.ts: 417 extents found, perfection would be 15 extents
I have my suspicions about disk fragmentation. Formatting it (and reloading recordings) would regroup the free space into one area.
I think you have hit on the problem. I was recording and playing back at the same time. When I finished the playback I deleted the file - hence pixelation.I've had a play, useful data for general consumption.
Simultaneous recording of two HiDef programmes, playback of a HiDef recording, and DLNA streaming of another HiDef recording - no problem. Ditto while performing a couple of gigabytes copy to USB - no problem. I then deleted a couple of gigabytes, and got stutters in the recordings. (I can't imagine what's so hard about deleting - all it needs to do is mark the disk sectors as free in the allocation tables.)
Then I ran simultaneous recording of two HiDefs, one streamed playback of HiDef, live timeshifted play of a third HiDef channel, and 5GB copy from USB to internal disk. Again, no problem until I queued up a delete.
So that's 3 write and 2 read operations at HiDef data rate, plus a copy write from USB at (what I guess was) about 4 or 5 times HiDef data rate.
In summary, there seems to be plenty of bandwidth for normal operations, just avoid deleting while recording (and possibly copies to virtual drive).
I'm not sure whether the eventual deletion from the recycle bin imposes the same kind of load, but certainly a modification could be made to ensure it is done in a quiet period.
I am removing the files via the Humax Menus only. I have done the deletion through SAMBA only once and that was definitely not the case when I had the extreme pixelation and loss of signal message.How are you deleting the files? Removing a large file over Samba/NFS or via telnet will generally cause pixelation of recordings and playback in progress, particularly if they're HD. Removing the file via the on-screen menus, webif or trm command shouldn't cause this because they truncate the file in stages, spreading the filesystem extent deallocations over multiple journal entries.
Automatic removal from the bin uses trm so is gentle on the filesystem and disk bandwidth.
Mem: 122036K used, 2948K free, 0K shrd, 4272K buff, 48960K cached
CPU: 40% usr 15% sys 0% nic 35% idle 5% io 0% irq 1% sirq
Load average: 2.09 2.23 1.37 6/161 1905
PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %VSZ %CPU COMMAND
173 155 root S 365m 299% 55% /usr/bin/humaxtv
341 9 root SW< 0 0% 2% [kjournald]
Just a reminder since some people still seem to think it is broken. The problem of the processes 'temp' and 'vmstat' using excessive CPU has been fixed in the latest version of sysmon (1.1.0). See here for details. I have been running it for nearly two months with no problems whereas previously I would see picture break up.I have noticed that the sysmon package seems to use lots of CPU every now and again. The processes 'temp' and 'vmstat' seem to use lots of CPU when presumably all they are doing is reading some values and storing them in a database.
Code:PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2133 root 20 -5 7808 7104 1168 R 92 5.7 0:28.36 vmstat