Poor Signal Quality?

prpr said:
SDN is 29, Arq A is 37, everything else is in between. That tells you exactly which the highest one is. Do I really need to spell out that 37 is the highest of these?
Click to expand...
By "in between" I thought you meant signal strength since you only listed strengths for the other muxes.
 
Rodders53 said:
I infer that yours split aerial feed goe into the 2000T, then via the rf passthrough amp ---> 5000T another RF pass amp ----> Aura... If all in same location try different combos 5000T- Aura - 2000T; Aura - 2000T -5000T to see if they (and the metering numbers) behave differently?
Click to expand...
There's a reason for the current order, the 5000T interrupts the aerial out when coming out of standby - so has to be last. The Aura likes to crash occasionally, so can't be first. Ideally it would be 2000T, split to Aura and 5000T separately. That runs into signal problems. Replacing first split with amplifier can work, but a passive split after 2000T has caused all kinds of fun in the past (tuners appearing to interfere with each other etc.)
At the moment the quality on each device is okay at 100% - excluding Local. I don't want to interfere with a working configuration until it inevitably goes wrong.
 
Anyway, channel 37 is not high in the grand scheme of things. Pre DSO I had a mux on 67 at my house and that really is difficult to receive if there is any water penetration or your cables are poor. It's one of the reasons I went for an aerial in the loft, that and no gable end or chimney to put one on.
 
Even worse, it wasn't right, with the wrong strengths. Sky News is in ArqA, Sky News is transmitted on UHF 37. If only my crib sheet next to the TV hadn't been wrong!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top