Yes, and then I get stuck. Same thing happens on most examples of this puzzle. I can find the solution, but not using logic. Unless you count trial and error as logic - I don't. By that I mean filling in values and then backtracking/rubbing out when it fails. Now if I did it in my head rather than on the grid, is that logical Spock?You can fill in Column B, then the middle of row 3.
No I don't.Unless you count trial and error as logic - I don't.
Could be. I do it that way if possible, but sometimes you can't keep all the detail in your head without writing it down.Now if I did it in my head rather than on the grid, is that logical Spock?
That is my method. Usually, quite early, I get to the point where I can't see futher moves. Then I resort to what I've called trial and error. Sometimes that reveals I've missed an obvious, logical, move. More likely it's a case of "if this, then that" until I end up with (for example) two 4s on the same line. I have to write it down, my short term memory often fails because I'm easily distracted. (That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it). I'm not very good at chess either.Rule out the impossible, write down the possible, then eliminate the impossible step by step by rows and columns either by inspection or by eliminating pairs or triples
That's the key, yes, and sometimes there is a chain of those to fathom.Spotting two squares that can only be (eg) 2 or 5 in one line, and that this means the other three squares cannot contain those numbers, seems to be the key to my difficulties. I often miss them!
You're right, glad you're awake. Typo on my part.B4 not B3?
A1<A2<A3<B3 ∴︎ A1≤︎2Not sure about your A1,C1,E1 assertion.
A rare occurrence!You're right, glad you're awake.