Call the aerial installer back under Guarantee... it was only 6 months ago.
It may only need the aerial raising up a bit to change the signal level on the Arq A frequency (maybe at the expense of one of the others, though).
Wolfbane predicts for that provided postcode at 10 metres above the ground NO LINE OF SIGHT from either transmitter so diffracted signals = standing waves.
47 dBuV/m for Caradon and 45 dBuV/m Plympton.
Raising the receive aerial to 12 metres above ground Plympton becomes (just) line of sight and 48dBuV/m, but diffracted signals off the ridge(s) are still be present as well. (Caradon is 100% diffracted signals still, but now at 49 dBuV/m.)
The path profiles have that point in a very low spot.
Those S/Q numbers for Caradon through the back of the reflector suggest to me that a suitable aerial pointed correctly should work... but I'm not on site, of course. The signals are diffracted but careful aerial positioning should get them all roughly equal signal level.
Freeview interference predictions are all green for both transmitters but the numbers are better for Caradon Hill - especially the COMs.
That is a
Tri-boom aerial. Justin of ATV aerials Sheffield has done some tests on one.
www.aerialsandtv.com
Note it's gain is poorer at group A Caradon cf group B Plympton.
A good quality Yagi 18 element (group K) would out perform that beast
and have lower wind loading.
https://www.aerialsandtv.com/knowledge/aerials/atvs-choice-of-tv-aerials-and-why-we-chose-them
Standing waves are where some frequencies are reinforced and others cancelled out... that is why 44 is poorer than the others.
Getting the aerial higher may be necessary. A better, stronger, pole and stand off T-K brackets may be required to do that, though.
https://www.aerialsandtv.com/knowledge/poles-and-masts is essential reading for such items.