Just been studying the rules.
Rule one contains a statement that is impossible to achieve.
"An anagram of all the letters in the previous word, plus or minus one letter;"
You cannot have a word that is an anagram of ALL the letters in the previous word that is shorter than the previous word. Pah!
Stupid game.
Well, it might have gone over people's heads, but Trev played RATTLES (slightly obscurely), so STARLETS is valid as a succession... unless it's validity as an English word is being challenged? prpr's RATTLES is not valid, because of repetition.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.