EEPhil
Number 28
I was thinking of passing it back to the original grocer (#1507).I have no problem passing the blame to you two if you want it.
I was thinking of passing it back to the original grocer (#1507).I have no problem passing the blame to you two if you want it.
I have so much difficulty with the word "image"!
Thought the "photo" might have made you shy. Hence your disappearance.I have so much difficulty with the word "image"!
Well... yes, actually. They didn't get my best side, but fortunately not my emissions at other wavelengths!Thought the "photo" might have made you shy. Hence your disappearance.
One of the lead scientists was being interviewed on the World Service and said that it's akin to photographing a standard size doughnut on the surface of the moon.By my estimate (based on reports of the object being 40x10^9 km across and 500x10^18 km away), the scale of the map is of order 10 pico-degrees (pico = 10^-12)!!!
Yes. And the clue is in the word planning.I am also strongly against retrospective planning approval on principle
As MikeSh said.retrospective planning
Why? For most practical purposes pi can be approximated as 22/7 or 355/113 or 3927/1250. I can remember it as 3.14159265358, which is more than adequate for use in electromagnetic simulations.
Because they can. I make no comment on Google's motives, but if you want to test the raw speed/power of your supercomputer (to prove it's more powerful than the previous record-breaking supercomputer), it needs to be run on a problem you know the answer to (or at least can prove the answer is right afterwards).Why?
I have implemented one but I have no idea how it works
...methods which people some used for the same task and I could never understand.Monte Carlo