Media mistakes

Watching the news on iPlayer, the presenter stated a wildfire "covers a 0.6 mile area".
Most journos don't understand anything vaguely technical. This includes fairly elementary maths. Forget units, unless it's Olympic swimming pools, double-decker buses or football pitches, as these are the de-facto standard measurements of volume, length(height) and area.
a pet hate of mine... "off of".
Yes, an ex-colleague insisted on saying that repeatedly. It got quite wearing. I called her Penelope Pit-stop (not to her face) - you can imagine the type. Thankfully she moved on.
The easy substitution is "from"
It would have fitted most of hers.
"...it expected the [vehicles] to be present until at least midnight, although they were 'likely to be required for longer' ".
It gets the word count up and adds nothing, so they don't have to think up any more 'facts'.
A £180 licence for a litany of errors
You should see the $h*te that ends up on Appl3 News, a lot of which (allegedly) comes from our national newspapers.
 
I have just made a post elsewhere and accidentally used of instead of off.

Thing is I noticed it too late but if I now edit the post it flags it with an edited timestamp which troubles my OCD so I have left it. Fair enough to timestamp a substantive or late edit but I would rather the chance to do a spelling mistake or bad grammar edit in the few minutes after originally posting when usually no-one else has yet read it and had a chance to get upset by a post-read edit.
 
No-one's mentioned yet that 1 km = 0.6 miles but 1 square km = 0.39 square miles.

(edited from 0.38 to 0.39 as I'd truncated rather than rounded. Oh damn it, 0.4 to match precisions!)
 
Last edited:
if I now edit the post it flags it with an edited timestamp which troubles my OCD so I have left it
An "edited" flag is far less embarrassing than derisible content!

AvP: "it will flag it" not "it flags it". Please don't use the present-tense narrative fad when you mean future tense!
 
Back
Top