• The forum software that supports hummy.tv has been upgraded to XenForo 2.3!

    Please bear with us as we continue to tweak things, and feel free to post any questions, issues or suggestions in the upgrade thread.

PC Construction

I think what BH is trying to ask is, what graphics slots are stable, and likely to last as far as an upgrade? Will an upgrade in 2 years' time mean a new MB, processor, memory and RAM?
I wasn't, but it's a good question!
 
Last edited:
I think what BH is trying to ask is, what graphics slots are stable, and likely to last as far as an upgrade? Will an upgrade in 2 years' time mean a new MB, processor, memory and RAM?
I'm not sure that was a specific concern but it is the sort of thing implied in the last para of post #71. I think it's why I've not had much luck with upgrades as when I (try to) do it it's usually more like 5 years down the road and everything is slightly different. Within a year or two is less of an issue, unless you've picked a standard that went out just after you bought it ...

[Edit. Sorry, crossed with the man himself there.]
 
What about a USB dongle as a temporary video solution? I assume any modern OS would detect and use it?
 
Yes, but the list above is 'budget' only in terms of high performance cards - the cheapest is well over £100 which is a lot to potentially bin in a year or two. Basic cards are less than £30, which is much less painful to replace.
Sure, but I don't want to have to bin it - that's the point. Choose well now and never again. Is a GTX 1050 Ti or RX 460 going to be sufficient for my foreseeable needs (non gaming) - my guess is that it will, in that it does at least provide some co-processing ability to play with should the need arise. Anybody confirm?

But if I could get one for a decent price, the RX 470 is such a step up in capability...
 
What about a USB dongle as a temporary video solution? I assume any modern OS would detect and use it?
Would that really be cheaper than a cheap video card? (A brief Google suggests not, but I didn't go deep.)

Sure, but I don't want to have to bin it - that's the point. Choose well now and never again. Is a GTX 1050 Ti or RX 460 going to be sufficient for my foreseeable needs (non gaming) - my guess is that it will, in that it does at least provide some co-processing ability to play with should the need arise. Anybody confirm?

But if I could get one for a decent price, the RX 470 is such a step up in capability...
Time to hit the review and benchmarking websites :)
 
Why don't you just buy a motherboard with video built in? You say you don't need/use any fancy stuff, but then seem to want it. I don't quite get it...
 
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0722YB...veASIN=B0722YBZGK&ascsubtag=trd-1964645183-21

91LhVMSAxwL._SX522_.jpg
 
Very nice, but I'm not putting a 1080 on the shopping list!

Why don't you just buy a motherboard with video built in?
That's what I thought too, but it seems there is no such thing. Integrated graphics rely on being available in the processor, and so far there are no Ryzens with that facility.

You say you don't need/use any fancy stuff, but then seem to want it. I don't quite get it...
There's a difference between need and want. I don't need a six-core processor either, but I'll settle for six rather than eight (or 16!) as satisfying a want without going too silly on price (which is a personal judgement). I'll have a mid-priced video card with GPU capability because I can, and maybe the GPU will come in useful for something I haven't thought of yet, so again I'll choose what I consider the best compromise between capability and cost.

I don't have a 2l car because I need a 2l car - I have one because it makes driving more enjoyable and I can't justify the outlay and running cost of something even more enjoyable (although I did hire a 4.2l V8 Aston Martin Vantage for a couple of days for the bucket-list experience... which would have nearly paid for this PC so I don't know why I'm so bothered now!!! I suppose the difference is that I was just using the car for a couple of days and then it went back, whereas the PC has to be lived with. The Vantage wouldn't be practical as ones only car, or without a suitable garage to keep it in).
 
Is that six display outputs I see before me? :eek:

That's a good point actually: multiple monitor capability should be on my tick-list (although it would probably max out at 3).
 
The top range Mac Pro has two of those. Given the retail price of one, something does not add up. Also, why two? The Mac versions have a different number, D700.

https://architosh.com/2013/10/the-mac-pro-so-whats-a-d300-d500-and-d700-anyway-we-have-answers/

My thought that you should look at the spec. of a high end Mac and build it at a fraction of the cost, which usually works, failed miserably. I can't think the article is right, unless prices are artificially high to force people to buy a Mac. Of course, the cards will cost much less to manufacture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about a USB dongle as a temporary video solution? I assume any modern OS would detect and use it?
I don't see this helping much beyond the most basic video display as you'll be constrained by the USB bus speed, plus you'll neeed to check it works under Linux. I'd be inclined to pick just about any cheap PCIe Video card instead. But what about using the GPU specifically for video processing? I know Blender (for example) can utilise both CUDA & OpenCL, certainly in some tasks in which case those you short-listed are excellent options with the caveat that Linux users tend to favour Nvidia cards (google will reveal the gory details and bias).

Motherboards: X370 chipset is aimed at gamers so you can save money by ignoring those but the B350 chipset is the mainstream choice that offers certain features that are nice to have for video processing at around the £75 mark.
 
Yes, that was a good pointer way up this thread.

It's a shame there are no AMD cards in that comparison, but it gives me a warm feeling that I will be able to make use of a GPU. A lot of what I do with video is re-size it, and I might be inclined to do more with video if the process is not so time consuming.
 
It's a shame there are no AMD cards in that comparison, but it gives me a warm feeling that I will be able to make use of a GPU. A lot of what I do with video is re-size it, and I might be inclined to do more with video if the process is not so time consuming.
I'm unsure of the extent of the tasks you are hoping to achieve nor underestimating the "might as well" factor of a new build. But straightforward tasks like video re-sizing & transcoding can be handled more than adequately by the CPU alone (terminal, FFmpeg and your source material) especially considering the huge performance benefit Ryzen alone will give you.

Incidentally Adobe Premiere only runs on Windows/Mac (Linux has some powerful equivalent software), so the comment at the end of that article regarding matching the GPU needs to the actual package you intend to use is particularly apposite.
 
Back
Top