Black Hole
May contain traces of nut
The problem with forums is that almost invariably there will be people with differing opinions of what's best. There is also a wide variety of equipment available these days, of varying quality and price, and price isn't always an indicator of quality according to where it is supplied from.
In my opinion, convenience of installation and subsequent access overrides everything else. Yes, a cheap indoor mains-powered aerial amplifier may be "crap" compared with professional kit, but as long as it is installed somewhere easy to get to that's not a problem - if it dies after 10 years service, all you have to do is swap it out. If it dies after a few months service you swap it out under guarantee, and if it runs for a year without problems it will probably run for 10 (bathtub curve). Fit a masthead amp, and if that dies for any reason or however long in the future it requires an aerial fitter call-out (unless you are prepared to go up ladders yourself). Fit a masthead (weatherproof) amplifier in the loft and you are paying for weatherproofing you don't need.
If it's convenient to get a power point fitted in the loft, in my opinion that's better than running phantom-powered. There are more amps to choose from mains-powered than phantom-powered, and only one unit to deal with. There is a slight fire risk from running a mains PSU in the loft, but that can be minimised by keeping the amp away from combustible materials and ensuring adequate ventilation. There is already mains in the loft - the lighting circuit - so don't tell me there is additional risk from the 13A socket per se.
Yes, by all means test a passive splitter before committing to an amplifier. What I think worries us is that the signal will be just enough at the time, but prove inadequate in the long term.
I don't agree with prpr on the splitter following the amp - far better to use an amp with multiple outputs that may well be actively split rather than confining yourself to an amp with a single output and following that by a passive splitter. It's not like future options are reduced by having an amp with more than one output.
But, like I said, that's my opinion. Others might disagree. It is for the reader to consider the options and weigh up the arguments.
In my opinion, convenience of installation and subsequent access overrides everything else. Yes, a cheap indoor mains-powered aerial amplifier may be "crap" compared with professional kit, but as long as it is installed somewhere easy to get to that's not a problem - if it dies after 10 years service, all you have to do is swap it out. If it dies after a few months service you swap it out under guarantee, and if it runs for a year without problems it will probably run for 10 (bathtub curve). Fit a masthead amp, and if that dies for any reason or however long in the future it requires an aerial fitter call-out (unless you are prepared to go up ladders yourself). Fit a masthead (weatherproof) amplifier in the loft and you are paying for weatherproofing you don't need.
If it's convenient to get a power point fitted in the loft, in my opinion that's better than running phantom-powered. There are more amps to choose from mains-powered than phantom-powered, and only one unit to deal with. There is a slight fire risk from running a mains PSU in the loft, but that can be minimised by keeping the amp away from combustible materials and ensuring adequate ventilation. There is already mains in the loft - the lighting circuit - so don't tell me there is additional risk from the 13A socket per se.
Yes, by all means test a passive splitter before committing to an amplifier. What I think worries us is that the signal will be just enough at the time, but prove inadequate in the long term.
I don't agree with prpr on the splitter following the amp - far better to use an amp with multiple outputs that may well be actively split rather than confining yourself to an amp with a single output and following that by a passive splitter. It's not like future options are reduced by having an amp with more than one output.
But, like I said, that's my opinion. Others might disagree. It is for the reader to consider the options and weigh up the arguments.