• The forum software that supports hummy.tv has been upgraded to XenForo 2.3!

    Please bear with us as we continue to tweak things, and feel free to post any questions, issues or suggestions in the upgrade thread.

What max current will the rear USB actually supply 5V at?

...but then "fewer" falls into disuse and we no longer have the richness of language to distinguish between countable and uncountable objects. It's dumbing down all over again. Susie Dent | language anti-snobs are not necessarily right, it's just their opinion | promoting their own agenda.

Yes, as with any ethernet switch.
How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
 
Last edited:
How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
I was about to ask the same. It looks like a splitter rather than a switch, ie all the traffic is presented to all the ports. Not that that matters for the intended usage here, but if so then it is misleading to call it a switch (which directs traffic on the basis of MAC - IP mappings).
 
How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
In general a device that sends the packets to all ports is a network hub rather than a network switch which is selective on where it sends packets (based on MAC/IP address).
 
Last edited:
How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
An ethernet hub sends the packets everywhere (except the originating port). I have some old hubs at home since they are useful for packet snooping. I'm not aware of any gigabit hubs, the last hubs made were 10/100 and even those had a switch between the 10 and 100 megabit sections.

An ethernet switch uses layer 2 ethernet frame level switching. I learns which ethernet MAC addresses can be found on which port (even if indirectly) and sends the packets to just that port. This is not IP layer switching, indeed it works with NetBIOS traffic and other non IP traffic over ethernet.
 
Last edited:
I was about to ask the same. It looks like a splitter rather than a switch, ie all the traffic is presented to all the ports. Not that that matters for the intended usage here,
It is a gigabit ethernet switch. I can see from the traffic LEDs when speed testing my Apple TV 4K that the traffic is only going between the Apple TV port and the port to my router.
but if so then it is misleading to call it a switch (which directs traffic on the basis of MAC - IP mappings).
Ethernet switches know nothing about MAC - IP mappings, they work entirely in layer 2 using ethernet MAC addresses. Sure there are some managed complex switches that know about IP layers, but a basic unmanaged switch (which is most of them) knows nothing about IP.
 
Last edited:
How does the switch know where to send packets
It doesn't, so it floods them (ethernet frames, not packets (which is a higher layer term)) to all interfaces, but from traffic received it then learns which MAC addresses are reachable on which interface, and subsequently only sends to the relevant interface. It keeps an internal (forwarding) database, which is self-ageing in the absence of relevant traffic. It also expires relevant entries if the layer 1 link dies (i.e. you unplug the cable or turn off the connected device).
selective on where it sends packets (based on MAC/IP address).
It's nothing to do with IP addresses. MAC addresses only. It's a switch, which operates at layer 2. It knows nothing about IP (layer 3).
I'm not aware of any gigabit hubs
That's because there aren't any. The data rate would kill them, which is why switches supplanted hubs after 10 Mbps.
An ethernet switch uses layer 3 ethernet frame level switching.
Layer 2.
they work entirely in layer 3 using ethernet MAC addresses.
Layer 2.
Sure there are some managed complex switches that know about IP layers
Those that know about MAC and IP are layer 3 switches, which perform the function of IP routers and switches at wire-speed all in one device.
You ain't gonna get one of those for £15.
...but then "fewer" falls into disuse and we no longer have the richness of language to distinguish between countable and uncountable objects. It's dumbing down all over again.
Quite so. If no-one challenges it, then it happens by default, which is why it should (and must) be challenged.
 
It doesn't, so it floods them (ethernet frames, not packets (which is a higher layer term)) to all interfaces, but from traffic received it then learns which MAC addresses are reachable on which interface, and subsequently only sends to the relevant interface. It keeps an internal (forwarding) database, which is self-ageing in the absence of relevant traffic. It also expires relevant entries if the layer 1 link dies (i.e. you unplug the cable or turn off the connected device).
That sounds like quite a lot going on for £15.
 
It's not really that complicated compared to some things, but it's economies of scale for you. Develop it once in silicon, churn out zillions at marginal profit, make a wodge to include funding the next thing to develop.
 
That's because there aren't any. The data rate would kill them, which is why switches supplanted hubs after 10 Mbps.
So this 10/100 megabit 8 port Netgear hub I'm looking at is a figment of my imagination is it? I've had it for over 20 years. It's a 10 megabit hub and a 100 megabit hub with a switch between them. Each port is connected to the hub for the speed the port negotiates at. It's great for traffic snooping since all packets are sent to every port, as I'm sure you know.
 
Related, if still not relevant to the original question: https://old.reddit.com/r/Cisco/comments/1823ceu/explain_like_im_5_spanning_tree_protocol/kag6oc9/

Apparently you can't paste a Reddit link, or it gets rendered as [media=reddit]url_path[/media] discarding the critical domain old.reddit.com.
 
Last edited:
So this 10/100 megabit 8 port Netgear hub I'm looking at is a figment of my imagination is it?
I didn't really say that, but I don't think I've ever seen a 100 hub. Could you post a picture at some point please, just out of curiosity? I've got a couple of old Netgear metal boxes, but I'm nowhere near them at the moment.
 
I didn't really say that, but I don't think I've ever seen a 100 hub. Could you post a picture at some point please, just out of curiosity? I've got a couple of old Netgear metal boxes, but I'm nowhere near them at the moment.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0247.jpeg
    IMG_0247.jpeg
    277.7 KB · Views: 12
Back
Top