prpr
Well-Known Member
I guess that is generations of ingrained ignorance.Yorkshire usage, entirely normal to say "less"
I guess that is generations of ingrained ignorance.Yorkshire usage, entirely normal to say "less"
If everyone spoke and wrote perfectly, we would lose regional usage and dialects and the world would be a less interesting place.I guess that is generations of ingrained ignorance.
Not really. I have seen someone from the OED say that it is a faux distinction propounded by language snobs. Or was it something I heard Susie Dent say on the radio?I guess that is generations of ingrained ignorance.
Correct.
How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?Yes, as with any ethernet switch.
I was about to ask the same. It looks like a splitter rather than a switch, ie all the traffic is presented to all the ports. Not that that matters for the intended usage here, but if so then it is misleading to call it a switch (which directs traffic on the basis of MAC - IP mappings).How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
In general a device that sends the packets to all ports is a network hub rather than a network switch which is selective on where it sends packets (based on MAC/IP address).How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
Indeed. So this is definitely a switch?In general a device that sends the packets to all ports is a network hub rather than a network switch which is selective on where it sends packets (based on IP address).
An ethernet hub sends the packets everywhere (except the originating port). I have some old hubs at home since they are useful for packet snooping. I'm not aware of any gigabit hubs, the last hubs made were 10/100 and even those had a switch between the 10 and 100 megabit sections.How does the switch know where to send packets, or does it just send them everywhere (except the originating port)?
It is a gigabit ethernet switch. I can see from the traffic LEDs when speed testing my Apple TV 4K that the traffic is only going between the Apple TV port and the port to my router.I was about to ask the same. It looks like a splitter rather than a switch, ie all the traffic is presented to all the ports. Not that that matters for the intended usage here,
Ethernet switches know nothing about MAC - IP mappings, they work entirely in layer 2 using ethernet MAC addresses. Sure there are some managed complex switches that know about IP layers, but a basic unmanaged switch (which is most of them) knows nothing about IP.but if so then it is misleading to call it a switch (which directs traffic on the basis of MAC - IP mappings).
It doesn't, so it floods them (ethernet frames, not packets (which is a higher layer term)) to all interfaces, but from traffic received it then learns which MAC addresses are reachable on which interface, and subsequently only sends to the relevant interface. It keeps an internal (forwarding) database, which is self-ageing in the absence of relevant traffic. It also expires relevant entries if the layer 1 link dies (i.e. you unplug the cable or turn off the connected device).How does the switch know where to send packets
It's nothing to do with IP addresses. MAC addresses only. It's a switch, which operates at layer 2. It knows nothing about IP (layer 3).selective on where it sends packets (based on MAC/IP address).
That's because there aren't any. The data rate would kill them, which is why switches supplanted hubs after 10 Mbps.I'm not aware of any gigabit hubs
Layer 2.An ethernet switch uses layer 3 ethernet frame level switching.
Layer 2.they work entirely in layer 3 using ethernet MAC addresses.
Those that know about MAC and IP are layer 3 switches, which perform the function of IP routers and switches at wire-speed all in one device.Sure there are some managed complex switches that know about IP layers
Quite so. If no-one challenges it, then it happens by default, which is why it should (and must) be challenged....but then "fewer" falls into disuse and we no longer have the richness of language to distinguish between countable and uncountable objects. It's dumbing down all over again.
That sounds like quite a lot going on for £15.It doesn't, so it floods them (ethernet frames, not packets (which is a higher layer term)) to all interfaces, but from traffic received it then learns which MAC addresses are reachable on which interface, and subsequently only sends to the relevant interface. It keeps an internal (forwarding) database, which is self-ageing in the absence of relevant traffic. It also expires relevant entries if the layer 1 link dies (i.e. you unplug the cable or turn off the connected device).
Corrected. It's been 20 years since I wrote networking code and I'm a little rusty.Layer 2.
So this 10/100 megabit 8 port Netgear hub I'm looking at is a figment of my imagination is it? I've had it for over 20 years. It's a 10 megabit hub and a 100 megabit hub with a switch between them. Each port is connected to the hub for the speed the port negotiates at. It's great for traffic snooping since all packets are sent to every port, as I'm sure you know.That's because there aren't any. The data rate would kill them, which is why switches supplanted hubs after 10 Mbps.
https://old.reddit.com/r/Cisco/comments/1823ceu/explain_like_im_5_spanning_tree_protocol/kag6oc9/
[media=reddit]url_path[/media]
discarding the critical domain old.reddit.com.I didn't really say that, but I don't think I've ever seen a 100 hub. Could you post a picture at some point please, just out of curiosity? I've got a couple of old Netgear metal boxes, but I'm nowhere near them at the moment.So this 10/100 megabit 8 port Netgear hub I'm looking at is a figment of my imagination is it?
Yeah, but it probably happens inside one IC with no other chips required.That sounds like quite a lot going on for £15.
Unlikely, that would be more expensive to make.Perhaps an FPGA.
I didn't really say that, but I don't think I've ever seen a 100 hub. Could you post a picture at some point please, just out of curiosity? I've got a couple of old Netgear metal boxes, but I'm nowhere near them at the moment.