The WiKi is a reference book not a novel
We clearly have different opinions as to what constitutes a "reference book". In my view it should provide quick-reference summaries
and chapter-and-verse, with adequate cross-referencing between the two. As it stands the Wiki only provides the former, and would benefit from some detailed foot-notes and/or cross-references to the relevant forum discussions. I would be willing to plug the gaps, but I am already over-committed and in any case I doubt you would be happy if I invaded your turf.
Since you seem determined to throw down the gauntlet, let me suggest this to you: the Wiki is inconsistent in its presentation, is incomplete even in your own definition of "reference book", and is difficult to navigate without helpful hints posted in the forum. The narrative information I write in forum posts complements the Wiki and I see no reason to poo-poo my cross-references - at least I post links to the Wiki when there is something helpful, I notice you
never post links to the narrative.