Are we sure the old ones were can type?I am trying to remember whether Silicon is more prone to signal overload or more resistant to signal overload. Which is it?
Are we sure the old ones were can type?I am trying to remember whether Silicon is more prone to signal overload or more resistant to signal overload. Which is it?
The video reference in THIS POST (click) shows two metal-screened tuner modules side-by-side at 1:49. This is confusing, because one socket is an input and the other is an output.Are we sure the old ones were can type?
Old HW - From AVF thread on HDD changing
http://www.avforums.com/forums/14200990-post32.html
View attachment 753 View attachment 754
Here are a few that I took whilst removing the orange filter. They are not very good, but may be of interest to some.
View attachment 746View attachment 747View attachment 748View attachment 749View attachment 750View attachment 751View attachment 752
I'm as sure as I can be without trying it on a 1.03.36 box. I have a way of extracting the 1.03.06 firmware from the box (I won't post details of the technique publicly - but it was xyz321's idea). It requires installing a small software update in the normal manner (which doesn't overwrite anything that's really important and can't be restored from files that have already been extracted). Booting then extracts the firmware to an attached USB disk. Another software update restores normal box function.I have a graded GB that I received from Humax about 1 month ago with the latest firmware. I might be willing to give it a go if we were fairly sure it wouldn't be bricked. Wife watches emmerdale and would be pretty annoyed if it went down.
I'm as sure as I can be without trying it on a 1.03.36 box. I have a way of extracting the 1.03.06 firmware from the box (I won't post details of the technique publicly - but it wasn't my idea). It requires installing a small software update in the normal manner (which doesn't overwrite anything that's really important and can't be restored from files that have already been extracted). Booting then extracts the firmware to an attached USB disk. Another software update restores normal box function.
Let me know if you're willing to give it a go.
I've sent you a private message with instructions, thanks!Sure I will give it a go.
Plan is to put the custom firmware on so if you can figure this into any instructions once you have the firmware.
Great - I believe af123 wants to check out an unmodified box with 1.03.06
Hopefully he can extract some useful info . . .
I have extracted and uploaded the new firmware so hopefully it wont be too long before this problem is resolved.
Many, many thanks are due to The Asgard for doing the extraction and risking the wrath of SWMBO and to xyz321 for coming up with the process in the first place!
Posted on the move; please excuse any brevity.
Are you still in this state? I have uploaded a 1.03.06 upgrade file to http://www63.zippyshare.com/v/27267442/file.htmlAnyways I have downgraded to the official firmware and am now left with an apparently bricked box
I don't understand why they would do this from an economic point of view, unless this is development work for future products.Changes in 1.03.06 that I've found so far.
So it seems that this release is predominantly aimed at improving/extending the Portal side of things and possibly allowing remote scheduling in the future.
- The embedded web browser that's used for the portal has been replaced. Older firmwares contained the ANT Galio Browser whereas 1.03.06 contains Opera (Opera/9.80 Presto/2.9.115 Version/11.10).
- Tuning of the IP networking stack to override Linux defaults (possibly to improve browser performance);
- The code contains references to filesystem checking - perhaps the disk test has been improved or they are working on allowing recovery from filesystem errors without a reformat;
- It has some references to new menu items relating to remote scheduling and obtaining the EPG via the Internet (14 day EPG?);
- custom-portal / portal-xtra1 will no longer work as-is.
I don't understand why they would do this from an economic point of view, unless this is development work for future products.