Assuming you are talking about the RAC reference. Perhaps the wiper's on intermittent wipe. Looks like the RAC dropped the ball on this one - the photos seem to be using left hand drive cars.They should include instructions to use your wipers as obviously they are not in their photos. The top photo shows pretty good vis with minimal spray. Vis would improve even more by the use of wipers.
Well, on current experience it does seem that terrorists in the UK may believe this.Apparently, a terrorist vehicle is only capable of mounting a pavement on a bridge.
What about tell?Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide, as the song goes.
Wasn't there one or more in France that didn't involve a bridge?Apparently, a terrorist vehicle is only capable of mounting a pavement on a bridge. Thus, barriers are only necessary on bridges.
I'm sure Diane Abbott could work out how to pay for it. (Give her an abacus and the back of a fag packet...)Off the Labour Party Money Tree, silly. Where else?
Or the banker bailout and bonus tree? You have to look at the cost of not doing these things, there isn't a magic money tree to cope with no nurses and doctors, either. There isn't a magic nurse and doctor tree.Off the Labour Party Money Tree, silly. Where else?
All of the above, it seems.Is she ill? Alcoholic? Early dementia?
The spacing would be wrong, and the 100 year wait might be a problem, unless you propose a Chamaecyparis hedge along the kerb.Could we not disguise the ugly bollards to look like trees?
Or ... plant trees and have boulevards rather than bollarvards?
If this was AvP, I would ask more questions. But, as it isn't, which brake light was working? Why don't people check their lights? I always used to check my lights thoroughly before going on any long journey (get someone to tell me if they are working) - and briefly on a more regular basis (reverse into garage and check mirror).I was following a woman in an Audi off the M49 onto the M4 tonight - it only had one brake light working out of three.
There are many roads near me with trees along the kerb. Trouble is the County Council (responsible locally for the roads) keeps chopping them down - claiming root damage or that the tree is the subject of a compensation claim or that it is diseased. Where they have been left standing, some idiots like to park their car in the tree trunk. This usually happens at a junction where people don't look properly, drive too fast, and then have to swerve. Brings the car to a quick halt, but rips the bark off the tree.The spacing would be wrong, and the 100 year wait might be a problem, unless you propose a Chamaecyparis hedge along the kerb.
I realised the sentence was poorly constructed at the time (is that a split infinitive?), but decided life's too short!If this was AvP, I would ask more questions.
Right side. I guess it was a wiring fault rather than bulbs taking out the others, because I think the high level brake light uses multiple emitters. Interestingly, without brakes there was one tail light on the left and two contiguous tail lights on the right - so maybe this Audi has a tail light and a stop+tail light where my car only has a stop+tail.which brake light was working?
You must have very small cars in Nottingham.Where they have been left standing, some idiots like to park their car in the tree trunk.
Alright, I'll bite....I realised the sentence was poorly constructed at the time (is that a split infinitive?), but decided life's too short!
Dangerous. I fitted a high level light to my old car before they became a standard fixture. There was a small amount of light leakage, so you could tell if the light wasn't working. I doubt that is the case with modern cars. (When I asked, I was assuming that it might be obvious if the high level light wasn't working. In hindsight, it was a wasted question!)Right side.