Driving and Roads

Very early on I got stopped by the police for having my rear fog light on inappropriately. That set the luck factor for the rest of my driving career. Every time I see a rear fog light, I think "bastard"!

I got my own back once. I was heading for home fairly late one night, through a built up area, and I spotted a police car travelling in the same direction further ahead so I kept well back. The cops were out of sight when another car came up behind me with a defective headlight - I pulled in and let it pass. Further on, there it was having a conversation with the police (and giving them something to do so I could speed up a bit).
 
Toxic air pollution hits record levels

Peter Yeung

April 15 2017, 12:01am, The Times


A road near Caerphilly in Wales had the second highest recording of nitrogen dioxide

Demands for a crackdown on diesel vehicles have intensified after a Times investigation found a rise in the number of communities blighted by toxic air.

A study of 146 government-run monitoring stations shows 26 are recording nitrogen dioxide levels that breach European Union legislation and World Health Organisation guidelines.

This is the highest number in breach of guidelines in the past decade, according to figures from the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.

It comes as the government is preparing to publish its plans to improve air quality. The High Court ruled last year that the current plan was inadequate — ordering a replacement to be produced by April 24.

Levels of nitrogen dioxide, which is linked to breathing problems, are supposed to be kept below 40 micrograms per cubic metre of air (g/m³). However, a station on Marylebone Road in London recorded the highest average this year and also last year, with 82g/m³, according to Defra’s Automatic Urban and Rural Monitoring Network.

Hafod-yr-Ynys Road in Caerphilly, Wales, which passes through the valley town of Crumlin, had the second highest recording of 81g/m³. Five of the ten worst spots were in London and others were in Glasgow, Stoke-on-Trent and Belfast. Diesel cars are among the leading producers of nitrogen dioxide, prompting demands for a crackdown.

Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, has already said he will bring in a fee of up to £24 a day for polluting vehicles including the congestion charge. The government may be considering similar measures as part of its clean air plan.

Jonathan Grigg, professor of paediatric respiratory and environmental medicine at Queen Mary University of London, and founding member of Doctors Against Diesel, said there was “overwhelming proof” of the harm caused by air pollution, pointing to its links with cancer, asthma, heart disease, dementia and stunting lung-growth in children.

“Diesel fleets should be removed from the roads as soon as possible,” he said. “Exposure over a very long time has an insidious effect. It suppresses the lung growth of children, it’s involved in the onset of asthma, a decline in lung function as you age, and there’s emerging evidence of it causing cognitive problems and also reduced growth of foetuses.

“Targeting diesel cars is a very easy way to reduce emissions. At the moment, it’s still relatively advantageous to drive a diesel vehicle — there’s not enough disincentive.”

Some 40,000 deaths are “attributable” to air pollution each year in the UK, according to a study published last year by the Royal College of Physicians.

Health hazard

Pollution figures projected from previously recorded UK figures


In 2017, so far 11,453 people have died air pollution-related deaths

Source: Defra, Public Health England

An analysis of London Air Quality Network data by The Times reveals 400 instances where the hourly mean of nitrogen dioxide exceeded 200g/m³, which the World Health Organisation classifies as “toxic”, from the start of 2017 until the end of March.

A spokeswoman for Defra said: “Improving air quality is a priority for this government and we are determined to cut harmful emissions. Our plans have always followed the best available evidence — we have been clear that we are ready to update them if necessary.”

ANALYSIS
There are 40,000 deaths per year attributable to exposure to outdoor air pollution, according to an oft-repeated figure.

However, that doesn’t mean there are 40,000 deaths each year with “pollution” cited as the cause of death. Air pollution tends to do damage by making existing illnesses worse so it is a calculation to make it easier to compare with other things that harm people’s health.

The 40,000 figure was first calculated for a report by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, released in February 2016.

There is generally agreed to be a 6 per cent increase in annual mortality risk per 10 microgrammes of PM2.5 (particulates less than 2.5 micrometres) per cubic metre.

WHAT CAN BE DONE TO CLEAN UP?

Pay-per-pollute
Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, this month announced that owners of diesel cars more than two years old will have to pay up to £24 a day to drive in central London. A separate system proposed by a vehicle-tracking firm would penalise drivers who produce higher levels of pollution.

Ban diesel vehicles
Paris, Madrid, Athens and Mexico City plan to prohibit diesel vehicles by 2025. Paris has banned diesel vehicles registered before 1997.

Evacuate hotspots
Cornwall council is considering compulsory purchase powers to relocate families from hotspots.

Clean-air zones
Clean Air Zones are planned in Birmingham, Leeds, Nottingham and Southampton by 2020.

Remove speed bumps
Researchers at Imperial College London found that 98 per cent more nitrogen dioxide and 64 per cent more carbon dioxide is produced by bumps.


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/toxic-air-pollution-hits-record-levels-d3fl56xng
 
Last edited by a moderator:
...Clean Air Zones are planned in Birmingham, Leeds, Nottingham and Southampton by 2020.
...Remove speed bumps
:doublethumbsup:
Nottingham already claims to be a "world-leader" in greener and cleaner public transport - see here. As I pointed out somewhere else, I have a nice electric bus route on my road...with diesel buses!
 
Last edited:
Nope, they are stinky, smelly diesel diesel!
But the bus is one of the last free buses* still operating in Notts. The company that runs them is funded by the city council, and it is the city that has the serious pollution problems (despite what the article linked to in post #123 says). As this bus runs mainly through the county we are being left with old rickety diesel buses that have been taken off the other routes. I'm just grateful it wasn't taken away or charged for in the latest round of cuts. (A hospital link bus wasn't so lucky)
(* the bus is free because it is partly paid for when 5 GP practices moved to a giant new building quite a long way from existing patients - part of the planning permission had the GPs contribute - but for how long. When the route first started they used electric buses, and it is still advertised as such)
 
We already pay by the mile, and heavy vehicles (which do the most damage) pay more by the mile (except for their kick-backs).
 
I think the suggestion is appropriate, to account for the move towards vehicles that pay little or no tax in the form of purchasing fuel (and in theory not even through the electricity bill if they have their own generation plant). However, if implemented, I would expect to see a massive reduction in the tax on petrol to compensate - and I bet there wouldn't be!

By the same token, with a pay-by-mile scheme in operation (as has been the case until electric vehicles disrupted it), I see no need for the vehicle licence fee (although some kind of roadworthyness and legality certification is still required).

I see no conflict of interest unless they have some connection with Wolfson.
 
We already pay by the mile, and heavy vehicles (which do the most damage) pay more by the mile (except for their kick-backs).
Uh? By the litre? This is proposed as a universal flat rate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is the complication of foreign vehicles. Do you check the odometer on them regularly, or impose a prohibitive fine every time they enter the country?

This has to go hand in hand with a pollution tax, of course, so I guess fuel duty stays, but VED could go. Maybe payment per mile could be based on some pollution index? MPG is no universal measure of pollution. Then there is the pollution at power stations caused by generating electricity to charge electric vehicles. It is far, far more complicated than first appears.

No Wolfson prize for this half baked idea, nor chicks for free.
 
I see no conflict of interest unless they have some connection with Wolfson.
Yeah, I suppose it's not really. But this charging policy was invented long before the ICE and has been proposed many times in recent years, so for the boss of the AA to resurrect it as a 'new' idea and have a chance of winning £1/4 million for, smells strongly of something that was also common before the ICE.
 
To be honest, unless you have universal toll roads, per mile taxation is just too complex and certain to be abused. Liquid fuels are taxed, electricity is taxed (a little), so an annual fee for a RFL seems simplest. There's no reason it has to remain zero for electric cars for ever.
 
And as heavier vehicles generally use more fuel than lighter ones........
Yes, but are the ratios the same? Does a vehicle using ten times as much fuel also damage the roads ten times as much? I doubt it.

But then there is the NOx factor, where HGVs are properly tested and can produce as little such pollution as a tiny dirty diesel car.
 
We don't have to sneer at them, either. Or sing a song that stereotypes them.
 
Back
Top