Simples.Did you do this in time?
The mistake they made was making up 25 as 5x5, and not realising there was a 25 in plain sight!I wasn't watching but, the first one I could do within the 30s.
If you go down the divisible-by-6 route, it might take some time to spot that 88 = 100 - 25 + 2 + 4 + 7For some reason I couldn't do the second one quickly.
The mistake they made was making up 25 as 5x5, and not realising there was a 25 in plain sight!
If you go down the divisible-by-6 route, it might take some time to spot that 88 = 100 - 25 + 2 + 4 + 7
I think the divisible-by-4 route is quicker: 132 = 100 + 25 + 7
Sounds bang on to me.From the Independent online this morning:
"according to a US war think wank." The mind boggles!
A mass debate?Makes you wonder what goes on in these meetings.
Say Hi for us to socialist utopia.Referring to the Welsh urban 20MPH limit:
View attachment 6853
In whose world do those figures add up?!!
Diane Abbott's?In whose world do those figures add up?!!
Obviously! But DA has a legendary ability to cock up maths, so I thought I'd go for the less obvious.Well, the obvious answer is Mark Drakeford's...
That was the word I originally thought of. Auto-correct can be useful, along with auto-complete, especially when trying to type on mobile devices (with one finger, dammit!). They do produce some howlers. "Staved" - my auto-correct keeps changing it's mind what to put, but "survived" wasn't one of the options.Or perhaps 'staved' and the auto-correct didn't know that word.