Black Hole
May contain traces of nut
Good idea, but also to prevent more copper being ripped off the board.Might be worth applying a few strategically-placed blobs of Araldite for mechanical stability/to prevent possible shorts.
Good idea, but also to prevent more copper being ripped off the board.Might be worth applying a few strategically-placed blobs of Araldite for mechanical stability/to prevent possible shorts.
search ebay for 4.7uf 35v capacitor (leaded NOT Surface mount). That will get it working if you are not fussed about the aestheticsDo people have some of these capacitors spare?
as i said in my post, i had only electrolytic available to me, not this typeLike this?
5 x 4.7uF (475) Tantalum Bead Capacitor - 35V (max) - 1st CLASS POST | eBay
Brand new, high quality general purpose tantalum capacitors suitable for a wide range of electronic applications. <br> <br> <li>Quantity : 5 </li> <li>Capacitance : 4.7uF (475) </li> <li>Case Style : Radial </li> <li>Body Height : 7.2mm </li> <li>Body Width : 4.8mm </li> <li>Lead Pitch : 2.54mm...www.ebay.co.uk
Presumably the capacitor type or max voltage rating shouldn't be of concern for use in the Humax - either type should work.Electrolytic Radial Aluminium Capacitors 25V Polarised 4.7uF to 22000uF | eBay
Electrolytic Radial Aluminium Capacitors 25V (Different values available). A range of high quality, aluminium electrolytic capacitors with a radial style case, suitable for applications needing a cost effective high capacitance solution.www.ebay.co.uk
10-off 4.7uF 25V for £1.50 inc p&p. Wow! I don't know how they do it.
Not sure. Voltage is no problem, the required working voltage is 12V so anything greater than that should be fine. The trade-off is size (the higher the rated voltage, the physically bigger the capacitor will be). Size is not specified in the eBay advert, but experience says a 25V 4.7uF can will be pretty small! Too large and there will be difficulty fitting it - the leads will be too far apart if nothing else.Presumably the capacitor type or max voltage rating shouldn't be of concern for use in the Humax - either type should work.
ESR isn't going to be a relevent here - from the cct posted earlier it's got a 1k0 resistor in series with it after all and it's just slightly delaying the rise/fall of the +12V line.The real problem is the ESR (equivalent series resistance), which will be different between a typical wet aluminium electrolytic and a solid tantalum. I do not know whether that would make a difference, nor whether lower is necessarily better.
I think you might be right, that it is meant to delay switch-off. The reason it gives a problem during switch on could be that it has a high leakage current and therefore the FET doesn't get enough gate voltage.I've not been as involved in this thread as I perhaps could been and I'm now wondering why this cap is there. If I saw it in isolation I'd read it as being there as an afterthought to give a delay on switch-off, not switch-on where it seems to be giving problems. I presume the control signal is under firmware control so any delay could be done there.
Ta for that. The delays are exactly as I expected - no delay on switching HDD +12V on but a 50-60ms delay on switching off.If anyone is interested and has any thoughts/comments I have copied the circuit in to Proteus simulation software. As expected without the 4.7uF capacitor the switching is more or less instantaneous.
I include the oscilloscope traces for switch on and off of the HDD control, that is 5v and 0v input to 4k7 resistor feeding base of transistor (yellow), gate of MOSFET (blue) and feed to HDD (red). Vertical scale 1V division and horizontal scale 10ms division.
Indeed, assuming it's leakage and not something else.So if it is caused by the 4.7uF going leaky it should be measurable in circuit.
That's what I intend doing on this OK DTR but there's something else on the bench ATM.It would be interesting to discover the outcome if someone who has a unit with this fault could just remove the 4.7uF capacitor and see what happens.