Black Hole
May contain traces of nut
My glasses steam up.
They can't, the supermarkets are private premises. The worst that can happen is the supermarket makes a formal complaint and the police (might) turn up in a few hours after the miscreant has left (and the supermarket has no power to detain). This is all utterly misguided and toothless.If the police are in the supermarkets enforcing mask-wearing there
There's a joke to be made there...My glasses steam up.
Good thing. Following an infector indoors, even at 2m, for any length of time is a risk. Far better to just pass them at, say, 1m for a few seconds once or twice while going round.Anyway, the Tesco I use has solved the problem of shoppers and pickers disregarding the one-way system: they've abolished the one-way system.
That's basically what I've been doing.Far better to just pass them at, say, 1m for a few seconds once or twice while going round.
I agree, but we'll still be following 50% of them.Following an infector indoors, even at 2m, for any length of time is a risk.
The pikeys nicked it.
(Yes, I know you're not serious - or at least I hope not)I think you might need to go on a diversity course.
Only if you're getting exactly the same shopping. When 'they' stop to peruse a shelf you don't need scoot past to wherever you need to go.I agree, but we'll still be following 50% of them.
Mixed messaging again. How come that it won't be compulsory for the shop workers? The staff filling up the shelves are in the shop, not behind screens. They don't distance and they can belch out their droplets everywhere. If you believe Gove they must be bad mannered. Either there is a danger from people breathing out or there isn't. The virus can't tell you are a member of the supermarket staff.Face coverings in shops in England to compulsory from 24 July.
Not according to Matt Hancock. He said that "shop workers had suffered disproportionately and that 'the death rate of sales and retail assistants is 75% higher amongst men and 60% higher amongst women than in the general population'". I don't trust anything that Hancock says. When (not) answering questions in parliament he didn't seem to have a grip of his brief.FWIW last time I asked, a week or so ago now, there's been no case of CV19 in the local Sainsbury's shop floor staff despite their exposure.
I can see a logic: shop workers are subject to hundreds of people entering and leaving their environment; the shoppers are subject to only a few shop workers.How come that it won't be compulsory for the shop workers?
I can't. One infected shop worker could pass the virus on to loads of people - especially when you consider the lack of distance they keep from everybody. Don't forget these people are touching all of your food before you do. And, if you believe the latest utterings from various "scientists", a covering also protects the wearer. (BTW I'm very sceptical of this covering stuff. I just find this mixed messaging a bit annoying. Everyone in a shop wears a face covering or no-one wears one. Simples.)I can see a logic:
I haven't watched the video - I don't wear glasses despite the avatar.My glasses steam up.
Extremely unlikely. Most of the checkouts are behind screens now and you don't normally get talked at by the shelf stackers. (I do sometimes ask one where to find [obscure item SWMBO has put on shopping list], but I do so from a few feet away.)One infected shop worker could pass the virus on to loads of people
I'm that worried I keep forgetting to wash my hands let alone the purchases.If you are worried about surface transmission then you are of course cleaning all your purchases when you get home anyway, so that's a non-issue.