oijonesey
Hummy.tv SEO Guru
@ grahamlthompson - thanks for the input - I have added Section placeholders on the Wiki page to cover off Converters and Re-Authoring but they're not a specialised subject for me personally (it's took me this long to get my head around editing!!) so I might find it tricky to know what's worth recommending - is this something you might be able to help me with to define a scope on in a similar way to the editing scope? At least then we have a yardstick to refer to when considering what we want to include in the results, versus what we list in the 'Also Trialled'.
@fenlander - I do intend at some point to go back over the candidates that had audio problems to see if subsequent Codec updates might have fixed any of them - I can't recall which one but there was something we tried that was muted until a Codec update so maybe that's changed the outlook for some of the others. I still want to get my head around AVIDemux - it looks like it should be a good solution (for SD at least) apart from that Audio delay - I'm sure there must be a way around that if I try hard enough.
As for the remuxing to MP4 - it's not something I've delved into as I'm not so concerned with space (not yet at least) but perhaps that's more input for the scope on the Converter section - is it just about saving space or where is the meeting point between size and quality (no jokes gentlemen please!!)
@fenlander - I do intend at some point to go back over the candidates that had audio problems to see if subsequent Codec updates might have fixed any of them - I can't recall which one but there was something we tried that was muted until a Codec update so maybe that's changed the outlook for some of the others. I still want to get my head around AVIDemux - it looks like it should be a good solution (for SD at least) apart from that Audio delay - I'm sure there must be a way around that if I try hard enough.
As for the remuxing to MP4 - it's not something I've delved into as I'm not so concerned with space (not yet at least) but perhaps that's more input for the scope on the Converter section - is it just about saving space or where is the meeting point between size and quality (no jokes gentlemen please!!)