• The forum software that supports hummy.tv has been upgraded to XenForo 2.3!

    Please bear with us as we continue to tweak things, and feel free to post any questions, issues or suggestions in the upgrade thread.

[webif] Web interface

Ezra Pound said:
Just a quick Note about the new 'Strip' feature. Don't strip a previously stripped program as it appears to hang with stripping = 0% (even thought it does complete in the same time) and results in a zero size *.nts file, also the new *.ts file doesn't play. I purposely tried this on a file I was going to delete anyway, because sooner or later someone will do this accidentally.
Click to expand...
Thanks. The progress bar is tied into the size of the NTS file so that all makes sense. I will do something to address this!
 
Very minor thing I just spotted on webif 0.9.11 main page (bottom right)...

Web interface version: 0.9.11
Custom firmware version: 2.10
Humax Version: ?.??.??

EDIT: I've just seen the thread about upgrading to 2.11
 
0.9.11-1 uses a slightly faster strip process and does not allow stripping of already stripped recordings.
 
On the Schedule page and on the Remote Scheduler, is it possible when you delete an event that it is removed from the scheduled events list and only shown in the pending list?
Thanks very much.
 
That's not how it works. Commands are queued in the pending list until the box is rebooted to incorporate them into the schedule database. Until that reboot, the schedule remains as shown.
 
osmyth said:
On the Schedule page and on the Remote Scheduler, is it possible when you delete an event that it is removed from the scheduled events list and only shown in the pending list?
Click to expand...
Yes, good idea. I just deleted 6 things from the list myself this evening and it wasn't easy to keep track of where I was up to.
 
Black Hole said:
That's not how it works. Commands are queued in the pending list until the box is rebooted to incorporate them into the schedule database. Until that reboot, the schedule remains as shown.
Click to expand...
The entries in the schedule list could be marked in some way so you can tell that they're pending deletion.
 
With regard to the strip function, the final report includes a line similar to
Code: 
Saved: 3351691/4000256 packets (83.79%) - 613.71 MiB
This suggests that the new file is 613.7MiB but that figure is the amount that has been removed.
 
Black Hole said:
Very interesting. Engineering management says how about a background shrink utility, much like unencrypt?
Click to expand...
I think being able to mark folders for automatic stripping would make more sense (and I'm already planning automatic dedup folders and possibly automatic decrypt). For things that you watch and delete in a fairly short time frame, why expend the effort on stripping them?

Does anyone have any thoughts on why Humax are keeping these EPG data in recordings? It certainly seems to make no difference when they are removed (or won't when I get the index file sorted properly).
 
Black Hole said:
Laziness?
Click to expand...
They are stripping other frame types out though.. We know that they aren't looking at the EPG data during a recording, I wonder if this is a side effect of the EPG code not being interested in them? It feels like a bug though especially as earlier Humax models don't do this.
 
af123 said:
Yes, good idea. I just deleted 6 things from the list myself this evening and it wasn't easy to keep track of where I was up to.
Click to expand...

To minimise the number of entries which need deleting it would be useful to set the auto rs using an 'exact' search string, e.g. Silk the other day returned some things on qvc which had silk in the title. I changed the entry to just BBC1 afterwards. Also, it would be really good to just search the epg on your favourites channels only.
 
I've just uploaded webif 0.9.11-2 which fixes the FF/RW problem with recordings which have had their EPG data stripped.
I've also renamed the context menu option from strip to squeeze, changed the icon and updated the text on the following page.
It also fixes the problem that Ezra found and will tell you if a file has already been squeezed (although the new version also doesn't create zero-byte files if it somehow ends up running)
 
Seems to work great, it doesn't currently seem to allow the squeezing of multiple programs though - we have a LOT of kids stuff, 100+ Postman Pat, Mike the Knight, Horrible Histories etc and the first couple I tried from web-if gave back 23% or so .. now if we could tick this against a folders worth, or even multiple in one folder without having to dig around in telnet that would be perfect!
 
dragon-it said:
Seems to work great, it doesn't currently seem to allow the squeezing of multiple programs though
Click to expand...
That's coming in the next version. Kids' programmes are prime candidates since they are lower bit rate in general so they squeeze better!
 
I still think "shrink" was better!
fencers.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top