We don't know the views of 5500+ members so they can't be claimed by either side, we do know the views of the 6/8 group and the 14 group, as pointed out above it's supposed to be one member = one vote, so I'll leave it to the members to do the maths.Ok, last one from me on this subject.
5533 members, 6/8 active on the 'Arms, 14 complainers. Draw whatever conclusion you want.
EDIT - Some, (but not all of Trev's posts have been removed from this thread, this was not done at my request and although I can see the logic behind this, it does make it difficult explain the remaining posts.
Here is Trev's original #31 post
Trev : was it a group of 14 or a group of one 14 times.
Probably.The Doctor can now have a lesbian fling with Bill Potts! They could do it in a 3D episode with a binaural soundtrack. Have I overstepped the mark?
Even rules that get made up and applied retrospectively?But if them's the rules, then OK.
I didn't 'bring up' multiple logins, Trev did, when he accused me of doing what you have admitted to doing - maybe that is why you refer to yourself as 'We' in your postsAs to multiple logins, you can probe as much as you like so far as I'm concerned. Yes, I created multiple logins playing a game to claim ordinal member numbers; no I have not used them to boost my "like" count. Sour grapes, and only brought up to try to deflect criticism.
C: Find another pub.Some old farts are in the local snug having a conversation you don't like the content of very much. Do you:
A: Go find a conversation you prefer;
B: Invade their space to break up their evening.