EEPhil
Number 28
That's been going on for a long time. I've seen a 1950 British film where an actor says carryin'.I'm really starting to miss the g from '-ing' as increasingly people forget that it is there. It's all streamin', hurtin', buildin'...

That's been going on for a long time. I've seen a 1950 British film where an actor says carryin'.I'm really starting to miss the g from '-ing' as increasingly people forget that it is there. It's all streamin', hurtin', buildin'...
It was absent for a while, I can't decide whether to welcome it back.Gotten is sneaking in.
I don't think it ever left "Ill gotten gains"It was absent for a while, I can't decide whether to welcome it back.
Looking at the full OED the earliest date it quotes is 1381, but it has no quotes from 2019. The OED's most recent quote is as old as 2018.It was absent for a while, I can't decide whether to welcome it back.
Does the OED practise a rolling programme of checking entries for words. Could be the G section was last checked that year.Looking at the full OED the earliest date it quotes is 1381, but it has no quotes from 2019. The OED's most recent quote is as old as 2018.
I don't think it ever left "Ill gotten gains"
Ah yes, but I wasn't thinking of that context. I'll get my head into gear and think again.![]()
Mathematically, R is a dimensionless quantity so it can't (accurately) be called a rate (which would have some element of inverse time). R represents a numerical value, so "R number" isn't far from accurate, and it identifies "R" as something special to the listener who might not otherwise realise what just "R" thrown into a sentence meant.R rate
Not The Nine O'Clock News Swedish chemist sketch.

Aarrrgghhhhh!!!!! I've developed an aversion to this usage ever since Rod Stewart.I think someone may be doing some HD testing/tweaking in the coming days.
Er, no it isn't. It has the dimensions [infectee] / [infected].Mathematically, R is a dimensionless quantity